Drug-related deaths in the state of Oklahoma are predicted to hit a record high this year, according to the Oklahoma Bureau of Narcotics and Dangerous Drugs.
In 2008, there was a record 612 drug-related deaths in Oklahoma. Current autopsy reports show that drug-related deaths are at an all-time high early in the year.
Mark Woodward, bureau spokesman, said the number of drug-related deaths is expected to surpass those in 2008.
“We are predicting the numbers to be between 650 and 700 deaths involving drugs this year,” Woodward said. “One of the reasons for this increase in drug-related deaths is the growing problem of prescription drug abuse.”
The most abused prescription drugs are used for pain and anxiety such as Hydrocodone, Oxycodone and Xanax, Woodward said.
Prescription drugs accounted for 87 percent of all drug-related deaths in Oklahoma. Prescription drug’s easy accessibility has contributed to higher numbers of drug-related deaths, he said.
“Prescription drugs are very easy to get because they are legal,” Woodward said. “Many people that abuse drugs, such as cocaine or heroin, have switched to prescription drugs because it is easier to access and they think there is less risk involved. The easier the drugs are to get, the more deaths there will be associated with them.”
The problem of prescription drug abuse not only affects those being prescribed pain and anxiety medication, said Tiffany Couch, Norman Addiction Information and Counseling Center spokeswoman.
“There is a growing problem of high school and college students abusing prescription drugs,” Couch said. “It’s so easy for kids to reach into their parents medicine cabinets and experiment with whatever they can find.”
According to the 2008 Oklahoma Prevention Needs Assessment, 34 percent of high school seniors in the state have used prescription drugs recreationally compared to the national average of 23 percent.
Prescription drugs such as Adderall are often popular among college students trying to cope with their busy study schedules, Couch said.
“Anything that helps someone stay awake like Adderall is used often by college students,” Couch said. “Many don’t see Adderall as a dangerous drug. It is an amphetamine and a stimulant that speeds up the heart rate. It is very possible to overdose.”
Steps are being taken to combat the increase of prescription drug abuse. The Prescription Monitoring Program, which was originally started by the bureau in 1990, allows doctors to see electronic records of all medicine that has ever been prescribed to a patient.
Woodward said the program is helpful for doctors trying to assess whether the patient truly needs the medication or if they are just fishing for more pain pills.
“Many people try to go to multiple doctors in order to get more prescription medication,” Woodward said. “The Prescription Monitoring Program is not all about catching people and calling the police.
“It’s an intervention tool more than anything. We want the doctor to be able to sit down with the patient if they have a problem and offer them treatment options before it gets worse.”
In an effort to educate the public about prescription drug abuse, the bureau is sponsoring Prescription Drug Abuse Awareness Week, which began Monday.
Woodward said he hopes this week will educate more people about the dangers of prescription drugs.
“The public severely lacks education when it comes to prescription drugs,” Woodward said. “I believe that many deaths could be prevented if people knew how dangerous they are.”
Couch said awareness in the community is an important step in solving the problem.
“Education and awareness about this growing problem is the only way to begin fixing it,” Couch said. “If we can continue to bring communities together to understand the scope of the problem, we can make significant progress.”
The Oklahoma Daily is pleased to provide you the opportunity to share your thoughts about this article. We encourage lively debate on the issues of the day, but we ask you refrain from using profanity or other offensive speech, engaging in personal attacks or name-calling, posting advertising, or straying from the topic at hand. To comment, you must be a registered user of OUDaily.com. Thanks for taking the time to offer your thoughts.
You must be logged in to leave a comment. Log in | Register
yostarica 2 years, 1 month ago
Heckuva job, Daily! Good work on putting out another crap-tastic article. How does it feel to be agitprop for the drug war?
Deconstructing some of the claims here:
“The easier the drugs are to get, the more deaths there will be associated with them.” False. This is precisely the logic that has kept a completely harmless plant (cannabis) illegal for 70 years: if more people take it, more of some negative consequence will occur. But nobody has died from marijuana, ever. What matters isn't the drug, but the context in which it's delivered. Believe it or not, people can and do take dangerous drugs like heroin safely--witness Britain's approach, where the drug is administered in a clinical setting. It's worked beautifully, cutting crime and drug usage (http://bit.ly/aGkS7q). Drugs don't just kill people -- you have to have some underlying condition or mix some combination of drugs to really have problems.
“Many don’t see Adderall as a dangerous drug. It is an amphetamine and a stimulant that speeds up the heart rate. It is very possible to overdose.” Talk about a moral panic. Amphetamines are rarely fatal -- most overdose cases involve people with an abnormal sensitivity. Seriously, I know it’s hard to use Wikipedia and everything to double-check the propaganda of your sources, but: "The fatal dose … ranges between 50 and 100 mg/kg, or a factor of 100 over what is required to produce noticeable psychological effects." Yes, there are risks with these drugs, but the solution is more information and education, not more control over the lives of individuals.
“[The Prescription Monitoring Program is] an intervention tool more than anything.” I find it a tad improbable that the real concern here is the welfare of the patient. Histories of drug use can be and often are used to support prosecution of individuals -- all for making a choice about what they want to put in their body. For instance, Indiana's pseudoephedrine monitoring program -- which has done nothing to reduce the availability of meth -- has been used to prosecute people. Most famously, they decided to prosecute a grandmother who made the awful mistake of buying two boxes of cold medicine in one week (http://bit.ly/16p2pg).
This article is the reason the drug war continues, year after year, in spite of its obvious futility. Defining the problem as one of "too much consumption" is the wrong strategy: we should be asking how to minimize social harm, not how to make people pursue the lifestyle we prefer. Without that clarity, the rights and freedoms of individuals take a back seat to the interests of drug warriors and social engineers.